The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia is a digital encyclopedia and therefore does not aim to contain all data or expression found elsewhere. Although anyone can be an editor, Wikipedia’s community processes and standards make it neither an anarchy, democracy, nor bureaucracy. Reflection about yourself essay is not a place to promote things, is not a thought-book, a website primarily used for communication, a freely-licensed media repository, nor a censored encyclopedia.
Other than verifiability and the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover or the total amount of content. Some topics are covered by print encyclopedias only in short, static articles, but Wikipedia can include more information, provide more external links, and update more quickly. Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful. Although there are debates about the encyclopedic merits of several classes of entries, consensus is that the following are good examples of what Wikipedia is not. The examples under each section are not intended to be exhaustive. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide. If they cannot be expanded beyond a definition, Wikipedia is not the place for them.
In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, problem 7: I’m worried about liability with my students. Ask students to name a band or musician they’re listening to lately. Begin with a raw, you may find it helpful to create a chart or table to keep track of your ideas. User pages that move beyond broad expressions of sexual orientation are unacceptable.
Encyclopedia articles are about a person, or a group, a concept, a place, a thing, an event, etc. Usage, slang, or idiom guides. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of such languages are not. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information.
Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge. In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you.
Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. Advertising, marketing or public relations. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to pursue relationships or sexual encounters. User pages that move beyond broad expressions of sexual orientation are unacceptable. However, you very well may form new friendships as you go about improving the encyclopedia.